Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66698234 →Countries where authors are citing Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors
This map shows the geographic impact of Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors
This network shows the impact of Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors.
About Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF Human Motion Tracking Using Miniature Inertial Sensors
This paper, published in 2009, received 529 indexed citations . Written by D. Roetenberg, Henk Luinge and P. Slycke covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (220 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (136 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (108 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66698234.