Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.

299 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1963, received 299 indexed citations. Written by Newton C. Mead covering the research area of Epidemiology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (297 citations), Surgery (296 citations) and Infectious Diseases (6 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w66669444 →

Countries where authors are citing Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w66669444.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026