Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements
- Journal
- Cambridge University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6658114 →Countries where authors are citing Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements
This map shows the geographic impact of Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements
This network shows the impact of Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements.
About Principles of psychophysiology : physical, social, and inferential elements
This paper, published in 1990, received 681 indexed citations . Written by John T. Cacioppo and Louis G. Tassinary. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (248 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (185 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6658114.