Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage

610 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 610 indexed citations. Written by Stephen J. Ball covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (444 citations), Sociology and Political Science (318 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (205 citations). Published in British Journal of Educational Studies.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6641198 →

Countries where authors are citing Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Class Strategies and the Education Market: The Middle Classes and Social Advantage.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6641198.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026