PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
Impact in
- Pharmacology 486
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66403392 →Countries where authors are citing PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
This map shows the geographic impact of PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
This network shows the impact of PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.
About PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR THE Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder
This paper, published in 2010, received 995 indexed citations . Written by Alan J. Gelenberg, Paul Freeman, John C. Markowitz, Jerrold F. Rosenbaum, Michael E. Thase and Madhukar H. Trivedi covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (486 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (355 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (263 citations), Social Psychology (228 citations) and Clinical Psychology (213 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66403392.