Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.
- Authors
- Hubert L. Dreyfus
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66307914 →Countries where authors are citing Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.
This map shows the geographic impact of Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.
This network shows the impact of Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I..
About Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being in Time, Division I.
This paper, published in 1990, received 678 indexed citations . Written by Hubert L. Dreyfus covering the research area of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (189 citations), Philosophy (175 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66307914.