Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920
- Authors
- Samuel P. Hays
- Journal
- University of Pittsburgh Digital Library
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66307902 →Countries where authors are citing Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920
This map shows the geographic impact of Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920
This network shows the impact of Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920.
About Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920
This paper, published in 1959, received 323 indexed citations . Written by Samuel P. Hays covering the research area of Anthropology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (167 citations), Sociology and Political Science (87 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (78 citations). Published in University of Pittsburgh Digital Library.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66307902.