The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat.

385 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1967, received 385 indexed citations. Written by M. A. R. Freeman and Barry Wyke covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Small Animals and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (219 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (144 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (89 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w66192537 →

Countries where authors are citing The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w66192537.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026