Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
- Authors
- Division on Earth
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w66149341 →Countries where authors are citing Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
This map shows the geographic impact of Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
This network shows the impact of Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process.
About Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process
This paper, published in 1983, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Division on Earth covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (508 citations), Sociology and Political Science (371 citations) and Cancer Research (180 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w66149341.