Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics

391 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 391 indexed citations. Written by Eirik G. Furubotn and Rudolf Richter covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (180 citations), Strategy and Management (99 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (86 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w66110616 →

Countries where authors are citing Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w66110616.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026