The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
Impact in
- Authors
- Michael Power
- Journal
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6590684 →Countries where authors are citing The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
This map shows the geographic impact of The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
This network shows the impact of The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification.
About The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification
This paper, published in 1999, received 2.4k indexed citations . Written by Michael Power. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (604 citations), Political Science and International Relations (540 citations), Public Administration (468 citations), Strategy and Management (451 citations) and Education (415 citations). Published in London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6590684.