Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65698977 →Countries where authors are citing Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.
This network shows the impact of Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile..
About Clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and bile.
This paper, published in 1987, received 635 indexed citations . Written by Jean‐Pierre Sommadossi, William J. Huster and Robert B. Diasio covering the research area of Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (464 citations), Molecular Biology (233 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (145 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65698977.