Morphology of the folktale

1.0k indexed citations
published 1958
Journal
Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w65530259 →

Countries where authors are citing Morphology of the folktale

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Morphology of the folktale. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morphology of the folktale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morphology of the folktale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Morphology of the folktale

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Morphology of the folktale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Morphology of the folktale.

About Morphology of the folktale

This paper, published in 1958, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Vladimir Propp and Laurence Scott covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (404 citations), Sociology and Political Science (285 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (241 citations). Published in Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w65530259.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026