Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

11.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 11.6k indexed citations. Written by Laurent Excoffier, Guillaume Laval and Stefan Schneider covering the research area of Genetics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (7.2k citations), Ecology (3.3k citations) and Molecular Biology (2.8k citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w65398244 →

Countries where authors are citing Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w65398244.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026