Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.
Abstract
loading...
About
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65331697 →Countries where authors are citing Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.
This network shows the impact of Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Use and acceptance of complementary and alternative medicine among the general population and medical personnel: a systematic review..
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65331697.