The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.
- Authors
- Van Rossum Jm
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65331497 →Countries where authors are citing The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.
This map shows the geographic impact of The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.
This network shows the impact of The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs..
About The significance of dopamine-receptor blockade for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.
This paper, published in 1966, received 380 indexed citations . Written by Van Rossum Jm. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations) and Molecular Biology (120 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65331497.