Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65309952 →Countries where authors are citing Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation
This map shows the geographic impact of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation
This network shows the impact of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation.
About Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation
This paper, published in 1972, received 378 indexed citations . Written by Kenneth D. Hopkins, Julian C. Stanley and B. R. Hopkins. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (156 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (61 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (58 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65309952.