Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65214483 →Countries where authors are citing Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.
This map shows the geographic impact of Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.
This network shows the impact of Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016..
About Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2015-2016.
This paper, published in 2017, received 740 indexed citations . Written by Cheryl D. Fryar, Yechiam Ostchega, Craig M. Hales, Guangyu Zhang and Deanna Kruszon‐Moran covering the research area of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (385 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (138 citations) and General Health Professions (105 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65214483.