The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w652144 →Countries where authors are citing The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator
This map shows the geographic impact of The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator
This network shows the impact of The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator.
About The 2-10 keV luminosity as a Star Formation Rate indicator
This paper, published in 2002, received 426 indexed citations . Written by P. Ranalli, A. Comastri and Gianluca Setti covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (423 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (155 citations), Instrumentation (88 citations), Radiation (5 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (5 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w652144.