Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w65104807 →Countries where authors are citing Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.
This map shows the geographic impact of Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.
This network shows the impact of Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care..
About Patient and clinician experiences with telehealth for patient follow-up care.
This paper, published in 2019, received 253 indexed citations . Written by Karen Donelan, Esteban A. Barreto, Juan Estrada, Adam B. Cohen, Janet Wozniak and Lee H. Schwamm covering the research area of General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (197 citations), General Health Professions (139 citations) and Oncology (88 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w65104807.