Loss prevention in the process industries

694 indexed citations
published 1980
Authors
F.P. Lees
Journal
CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w65076109 →

Countries where authors are citing Loss prevention in the process industries

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loss prevention in the process industries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loss prevention in the process industries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loss prevention in the process industries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Loss prevention in the process industries

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Loss prevention in the process industries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Loss prevention in the process industries.

About Loss prevention in the process industries

This paper, published in 1980, received 694 indexed citations . Written by F.P. Lees. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (510 citations), Aerospace Engineering (279 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (221 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (191 citations) and Chemical Health and Safety (70 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w65076109.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact