Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
- Authors
- Chantal MouffeErnesto Laclau
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w64937425 →Countries where authors are citing Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
This map shows the geographic impact of Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
This network shows the impact of Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics.
About Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics
This paper, published in 1985, received 4.7k indexed citations . Written by Chantal Mouffe and Ernesto Laclau covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (2.6k citations), Political Science and International Relations (1.4k citations) and Education (489 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w64937425.