The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory

446 indexed citations
published 2000
Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w64730406 →

Countries where authors are citing The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory.

About The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Modern Social Theory

This paper, published in 2000, received 446 indexed citations . Written by Joanne Entwistle covering the research area of Museology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Museology (288 citations), Sociology and Political Science (131 citations) and Urban Studies (89 citations). Published in Research Portal (King's College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w64730406.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026