Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Torsten Hägerstrand
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w64620926 →Countries where authors are citing Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process
This map shows the geographic impact of Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process
This network shows the impact of Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process.
About Innovation Diffusion As a Spatial Process
This paper, published in 1967, received 718 indexed citations . Written by Torsten Hägerstrand covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (244 citations), Sociology and Political Science (137 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (102 citations), Political Science and International Relations (93 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (79 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w64620926.