Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63962707 →Countries where authors are citing Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction
This map shows the geographic impact of Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction
This network shows the impact of Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction.
About Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction
This paper, published in 2018, received 200 indexed citations . Written by Elizabeth Couper‐Kuhlen and Margret Selting covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (178 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (81 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63962707.