Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
- Authors
- Michael E. SouléJohn Terborgh
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6387784 →Countries where authors are citing Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
This map shows the geographic impact of Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
This network shows the impact of Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks.
About Continental Conservation: scientific foundations of regional reserve networks
This paper, published in 1999, received 307 indexed citations . Written by Michael E. Soulé and John Terborgh covering the research area of Anthropology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (213 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (119 citations), Global and Planetary Change (106 citations), Ecological Modeling (51 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (41 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6387784.