Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications

390 indexed citations
published 2010
Journal
Springer eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6363726 →

Countries where authors are citing Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications.

About Handbook of Applied Spatial AnalysisSoftware Tools, Methods and Applications

This paper, published in 2010, received 390 indexed citations . Written by Manfréd M. Fischer and Arthur Getis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (163 citations), Global and Planetary Change (93 citations) and Transportation (63 citations). Published in Springer eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6363726.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026