Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63504650 →Countries where authors are citing Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.
This map shows the geographic impact of Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.
This network shows the impact of Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists..
About Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists.
This paper, published in 1993, received 634 indexed citations . Written by Désirée van der Heijde, P L van Riel and L B van de Putte covering the research area of Rheumatology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Rheumatology (560 citations), Hematology (243 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (113 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63504650.