Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading
- Authors
- Jeffrey A. Packer
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63495948 →Countries where authors are citing Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading
This map shows the geographic impact of Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading
This network shows the impact of Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading.
About Design guide for rectangular hollow section (RHS) joints under predominantly static loading
This paper, published in 1992, received 330 indexed citations . Written by Jeffrey A. Packer covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (317 citations), Building and Construction (194 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (96 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63495948.