The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

14.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2014, received 14.7k indexed citations. Written by George A. Wells covering the research area of Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (3.2k citations), Epidemiology (2.4k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (2.1k citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w63489592 →

Countries where authors are citing The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w63489592.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026