Direct Action: An Ethnography

378 indexed citations
published 2009
Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w63385962 →

Countries where authors are citing Direct Action: An Ethnography

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Direct Action: An Ethnography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Direct Action: An Ethnography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Direct Action: An Ethnography more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Direct Action: An Ethnography

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Direct Action: An Ethnography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Direct Action: An Ethnography.

About Direct Action: An Ethnography

This paper, published in 2009, received 378 indexed citations . Written by David Graeber covering the research area of Anthropology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (221 citations), Political Science and International Relations (90 citations), Anthropology (44 citations), Urban Studies (30 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (30 citations). Published in London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w63385962.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026