To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.
Impact in
- Authors
- Swann
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w63373184 →Countries where authors are citing To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.
This map shows the geographic impact of To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.
This network shows the impact of To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification..
About To be adored or to be known? The interplay of self-enhancement and self-verification.
This paper, published in 1990, received 442 indexed citations . Written by Swann. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (248 citations), Sociology and Political Science (227 citations), Clinical Psychology (100 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (98 citations) and Applied Psychology (83 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w63373184.