The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies
Impact in
- Spectroscopy 105
- Authors
- Iain Johnson
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62892240 →Countries where authors are citing The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies
This map shows the geographic impact of The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies
This network shows the impact of The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies.
About The molecular probes handbook : a guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies
This paper, published in 2010, received 399 indexed citations . Written by Iain Johnson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (163 citations), Spectroscopy (105 citations), Materials Chemistry (104 citations), Biomedical Engineering (73 citations) and Biophysics (50 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62892240.