The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual

1.4k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 1.4k indexed citations. Written by Kathryn Fitch, Steven J. Bernstein, Bernard Burnand and Juan Ramón Lacalle-Remigio covering the research area of General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (361 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (273 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (254 citations). Published in Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62889154 →

Countries where authors are citing The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62889154.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026