Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62465016 →Countries where authors are citing Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.
This map shows the geographic impact of Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.
This network shows the impact of Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances..
About Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances.
This paper, published in 1968, received 353 indexed citations . Written by Kyoichi Nakamura, Hiroshi Sugano and K Takagi covering the research area of Gastroenterology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (247 citations), Surgery (228 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (81 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62465016.