Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.

592 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 592 indexed citations. Written by Donald O. Mutti, G. Lynn Mitchell, Melvin L. Moeschberger, Lisa Jones and Karla Zadnik covering the research area of Epidemiology, Transportation and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (528 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (451 citations) and Ophthalmology (331 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62331261 →

Countries where authors are citing Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62331261.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026