Cell Viability Assays

349 indexed citations

Abstract

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 349 indexed citations. Written by Terry Riss, Richard A Moravec, Andrew L. Niles, Sarah Duellman, Hélène A Benink, Tracy J Worzella and Lisa Minor covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Small Animals and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (122 citations), Biomaterials (44 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (44 citations). Published in Europe PMC (PubMed Central).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w62195948 →

Countries where authors are citing Cell Viability Assays

Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cell Viability Assays. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cell Viability Assays with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cell Viability Assays more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cell Viability Assays

Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cell Viability Assays. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cell Viability Assays.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w62195948.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015 Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper YOLO v3-Tiny: Object Detection and Recognition using one stage improved model Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Tracking Air Pollution in China: Near Real-Time PM _2.5 Retrievals from Multisource Data Fusion Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Preterm Heart in Adult Life Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper CNS Efficacy of Osimertinib in Patients With T790M-Positive Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Data From a Randomized Phase III Trial (AURA3) Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition Is Associated with a Distinct Tumor Microenvironment Including Elevation of Inflammatory Signals and Multiple Immune Checkpoints in Lung Adenocarcinoma Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. (Lamiaceae): a review of its traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey