Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

523 indexed citations
published 2017

Countries where authors are citing Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication.

About Towards a Green Economy Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication

This paper, published in 2017, received 523 indexed citations . Written by UN Environment Inclusive Green EconomyResources and Markets BranchText. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (169 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (115 citations) and Strategy and Management (96 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61674061.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026