Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

738 indexed citations
published 2014
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61560440 →

Countries where authors are citing Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses..

About Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

This paper, published in 2014, received 738 indexed citations . Written by C Lee Ventola covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (518 citations), Automotive Engineering (302 citations) and Surgery (205 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61560440.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026