Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses

1.1k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2012, received 1.1k indexed citations. Written by Andrew M. Q. King, M. J. Adams, Eric B. Carstens and Elliot J. Lefkowitz covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (447 citations), Plant Science (346 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (214 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61401432 →

Countries where authors are citing Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Virus taxonomy: classification and nomenclature of viruses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61401432.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026