Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact

627 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 627 indexed citations. Written by Shu‐Ting Chang and Philip G. Miles covering the research area of Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmacology (513 citations), Plant Science (333 citations) and Pharmacology (111 citations). Published in TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61373236 →

Countries where authors are citing Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mushrooms: Cultivation, Nutritional Value, Medicinal Effect, and Environmental Impact.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61373236.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026