The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry

285 indexed citations
published 2016

Impact in

Authors
John DeweyMelvin L. Rogers
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61355442 →

Countries where authors are citing The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry.

About The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry

This paper, published in 2016, received 285 indexed citations . Written by John Dewey and Melvin L. Rogers. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (125 citations), Political Science and International Relations (60 citations), Communication (45 citations), Education (36 citations) and Philosophy (23 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61355442.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisonsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performanceBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Quasi-Dense Similarity Learning for Multiple Object TrackingBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper A Statistically Precise and Relatively Simple Method of Estimating the Bio-Assay with Quantal Response, Based on the Logistic FunctionBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer — 29-Year Follow-upBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Strangers in Our MidstBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper A monofluoride ether-based electrolyte solution for fast-charging and low-temperature non-aqueous lithium metal batteriesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Calendar aging of silicon-containing batteriesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Interfacial Assembly and Applications of Functional Mesoporous MaterialsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Digital Twin for Intelligent Context-Aware IoT Healthcare Systems