Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II

2.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Michael B. First, Robert L. Spitzer, Miriam Gibbon, Janet B. W. Williams and Lorna Smith Benjamin covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (887 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (577 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w6124233 →

Countries where authors are citing Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders : SCID-II.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w6124233.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026