The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.
- Authors
- C. Geertz
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w61217642 →Countries where authors are citing The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.
This map shows the geographic impact of The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.
This network shows the impact of The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States..
About The integrative revolution: Primordial sentiments and civil politics in the New States.
This paper, published in 1963, received 395 indexed citations . Written by C. Geertz. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (250 citations), Political Science and International Relations (160 citations) and Anthropology (84 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w61217642.