Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture

1.1k indexed citations
published 1996
Authors
Bill Hillier
Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w61009017 →

Countries where authors are citing Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture.

About Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture

This paper, published in 1996, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Bill Hillier covering the research area of Building and Construction. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Building and Construction (750 citations), Global and Planetary Change (339 citations) and Transportation (247 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w61009017.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026