Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.
Impact in
- Cancer Research 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60726076 →Countries where authors are citing Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.
This map shows the geographic impact of Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.
This network shows the impact of Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia..
About Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Michael Michael, Graeme P. Young and Robert J. James covering the research area of Cancer Research and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cancer Research (1.2k citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations), Oncology (69 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (48 citations) and Surgery (34 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60726076.