Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication

652 indexed citations
published 1984
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w60612959 →

Countries where authors are citing Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication.

About Communicating With Strangers : An Approach to Intercultural Communication

This paper, published in 1984, received 652 indexed citations . Written by William B. Gudykunst and Young Yun Kim. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (275 citations), Sociology and Political Science (212 citations) and Social Psychology (198 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w60612959.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026