A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production
- Journal
- DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60348958 →Countries where authors are citing A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production
This map shows the geographic impact of A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production
This network shows the impact of A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production.
About A Realistic Technology and Engineering Assessment of Algae Biofuel Production
This paper, published in 2010, received 428 indexed citations . Written by Tryg Lundquist, Ian Woertz, Nigel W.T. Quinn and John R. Benemann. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (384 citations), Biomedical Engineering (146 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (50 citations). Published in DigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60348958.