Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales
- Journal
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w6002914 →Countries where authors are citing Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales
This map shows the geographic impact of Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales
This network shows the impact of Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales.
About Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales
This paper, published in 2005, received 270 indexed citations . Written by Hugo Carretero‐Dios and Cristino Pérez covering the research area of General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (112 citations), Clinical Psychology (80 citations) and Education (73 citations). Published in SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w6002914.