The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics

458 indexed citations
published 2010
Authors
David Taylor

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w59759898 →

Countries where authors are citing The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics.

About The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics

This paper, published in 2010, received 458 indexed citations . Written by David Taylor covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (404 citations), Mechanical Engineering (215 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (116 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w59759898.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026